Course Evaluation Reports

Semester	200901
Course #:	MATH213
Section #:	0401	# of Students in Course:	26
Course Name:	ELMNTS GEOM & MEASRMNT	# of Evaluations Submitted:	20
Instructor:	McLaughlin, E	Response Rate:	76.9%

ALL RESPONSES Course Evaluation Reports
ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

							MATH213	0401	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The course was intellectually challenging.	20	0	15	5	45	35	3.00	1.026	3.00
I learned a lot from this course.	20	0	5	20	40	35	3.05	0.887	2.78

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study? (Number of Responses 20)
5% CORE requirement	90% Major/Certificate/Minor/Program Requirement	5% Elective
Additional comments (e.g., about course content/materials, teaching style, etc.):
Teaching style: Teacher went through material too quickly.
Beth is AWESOME! She always responded to the students in a mature manner and took our questions seriously. She was able to teach us the concepts in a way to help us all understand and she encouraged us throughout the entire semester.

Loved having Beth. Was very responsive, helpful, willing, and fun
Elizabeth McLaughlin was a very effective and responsive instructor who communicated the expectations of the course very well
teacher was awesome, did not enforce attendance....which surprisingly has gotten the class to want to attend.
The teacher went a little fast when explaining things at first but she was always willing to explain concepts again if the students were confused. She was very nice I liked her a lot and she made the class enjoyable!

ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

Instructor: McLaughlin, E							MATH213	0401	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The instructor treated students with respect.	20	0	0	0	30	70	3.70	0.470	3.34
The instructor was well-prepared for class.	20	0	0	0	25	75	3.75	0.444	3.19
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher.	20	0	0	5	25	70	3.65	0.587	2.85

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

AVERAGE OF FIVE ADMINISTRATOR AGREE/DISAGREE QUESTIONS: 3.43 / 4.00
Scaled 0-4: Strongly Disagree=0; Strongly Agree=4. N/A is not in the average.

The standards the instructor set for students were ... (Number of Responses 20)
0% Too Low	100% Appropriate	0% Too High

STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

							MATH213	0401	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus.	19	0	0	11	47	42	3.32	0.671	3.03

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were ... (Number of Responses 20)
10% Too Low	90% Appropriate	0% Too High
Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was ... (Number of Responses 20)
0% Too Low	100% Appropriate	0% Too High
How much effort did you put into the course? (Number of Responses 20)
15% Little	55% Moderate	30% Considerable

STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

Instructor: McLaughlin, E							MATH213	0401	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course.	20	0	0	15	15	70	3.55	0.759	2.85
The instructor was responsive to student concerns.	20	0	0	0	20	80	3.80	0.410	3.07
The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content.	20	0	0	5	15	80	3.75	0.550	2.72
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

Grade distribution is current as of June 3, 2009 and includes students receiving a W for the course.
Course Evaluation Reports

Prev Course: MATH213 0301

Return to Main Menu

Comments, questions, and suggestions may be directed to OIT Help Desk