Course Evaluation Reports

Semester	200907
Course #:	MATH220
Section #:	0203	# of Students in Course:	19
Course Name:	ELEM CALCULUS I	# of Evaluations Submitted:	6
Instructor:	McLaughlin, E	Response Rate:	31.6%

ALL RESPONSES Course Evaluation Reports
ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

							MATH220	0203	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The course was intellectually challenging.	6	0	0	0	33	67	3.67	0.516	3.50
I learned a lot from this course.	6	0	0	0	33	67	3.67	0.516	3.32

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study? (Number of Responses 6)
33% CORE requirement	67% Major/Certificate/Minor/Program Requirement	0% Elective
Additional comments (e.g., about course content/materials, teaching style, etc.):
Good teacher :) Hard class
Beth is an exceptional instructor. She is very approachable and always takes the time to explain topics that students may find difficult. She has made herself available outside of the classroom for students requiring extra help and is always patient, understanding and happy to help. She is personable and unlike many other instructors, makes the subject interesting. She makes a point to explain how the topics may be useful to students in the future. Overall, Beth is a true asset as an instructor. I feel very fortunate that she was my instructor for Calculus.

ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

Instructor: McLaughlin, E							MATH220	0203	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The instructor treated students with respect.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.64
The instructor was well-prepared for class.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.53
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.28

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

AVERAGE OF FIVE ADMINISTRATOR AGREE/DISAGREE QUESTIONS: 3.77 / 4.00
Scaled 0-4: Strongly Disagree=0; Strongly Agree=4. N/A is not in the average.

The standards the instructor set for students were ... (Number of Responses 6)
0% Too Low	100% Appropriate	0% Too High

STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

							MATH220	0203	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.50

* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were ... (Number of Responses 6)
17% Too Low	83% Appropriate	0% Too High
Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was ... (Number of Responses 6)
0% Too Low	83% Appropriate	17% Too High
How much effort did you put into the course? (Number of Responses 6)
0% Little	17% Moderate	83% Considerable

STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

Instructor: McLaughlin, E							MATH220	0203	COLLEGE COMPARISON*
	Number of Responses	% Strongly Disagree	% Disagree	% Neutral	% Agree	% Strongly Agree	Mean	Stdv.	Mean
The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.33
The instructor was responsive to student concerns.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.43
The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content.	6	0	0	0	17	83	3.83	0.408	3.04
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

Grade distribution is current as of September 8, 2009 and includes students receiving a W for the course.
Course Evaluation Reports

Return to Main Menu

Comments, questions, and suggestions may be directed to OIT Help Desk