Course Evaluation Reports
Logout    

Semester 201007    
Course #: MATH240    
Section #: 0101 # of Students in Course: 24
Course Name: INTRO LINEAR ALGEBRA # of Evaluations Submitted: 13
Instructor: McLaughlin, E Response Rate: 54.2%
 
ALL RESPONSES
Course Evaluation Reports
ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.
  MATH240 0101 COLLEGE COMPARISON*
  Number of Responses % Strongly Disagree % Disagree % Neutral % Agree % Strongly Agree Mean Stdv. Mean
The course was intellectually challenging. 13 0 0 15 54 31 3.15 0.689 3.32
I learned a lot from this course. 13 0 0 8 31 62 3.54 0.660 3.30
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study? (Number of Responses 13)
0% CORE Requirement 100% Major/Certificate/Minor/Program Requirement 0% Elective
Additional comments (e.g., about course content/materials, teaching style, etc.):
Outstanding teacher.
THis course was challenging because of the proofs and concepts, but that actual calculations were almost trivial. Elizabeth was a very good teacher. She was active in the room and very forgiving in a lot of respects. Overall, her teaching style was very effective and I really enjoyed this class.
I really enjoyed how Beth took time to answer all of our questions and communicated on our level.
The teaching itself transcended any style - classes were phenomenal and all questions were answered completely and with insight into the reason and confusion behind the asking. This was incredibly effective, and I learned just by going to class for the most part!


ADMINISTRATOR UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
 Questions for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.
Instructor: McLaughlin, E MATH240 0101 COLLEGE COMPARISON*
  Number of Responses % Strongly Disagree % Disagree % Neutral % Agree % Strongly Agree Mean Stdv. Mean
The instructor treated students with respect. 13 0 0 0 8 92 3.92 0.277 3.35
The instructor was well-prepared for class. 13 0 0 0 8 92 3.92 0.277 3.21
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher. 13 0 0 0 8 92 3.92 0.277 2.85
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

AVERAGE OF FIVE ADMINISTRATOR AGREE/DISAGREE QUESTIONS: 3.69 / 4.00
Scaled 0-4: Strongly Disagree=0; Strongly Agree=4. N/A is not in the average.

The standards the instructor set for students were... (Number of Responses 13)
0% Too Low 100% Appropriate 0% Too High


STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP/COURSE ITEMS APPLIED TO ALL SECTION INSTRUCTORS
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.
  MATH240 0101 COLLEGE COMPARISON*
  Number of Responses % Strongly Disagree % Disagree % Neutral % Agree % Strongly Agree Mean Stdv. Mean
Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus. 13 0 0 8 8 85 3.77 0.599 3.15
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.

Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were... (Number of Responses 13)
0% Too Low 92% Appropriate 8% Too High
Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was... (Number of Responses 13)
0% Too Low 100% Appropriate 0% Too High
How much effort did you put into the course? (Number of Responses 13)
15% Little 54% Moderate 31% Considerable


STUDENT UNIVERSITY-WIDE INSTRUCTOR ITEMS:
Questions for use by faculty/instructors and students
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.
Instructor: McLaughlin, E MATH240 0101 COLLEGE COMPARISON*
  Number of Responses % Strongly Disagree % Disagree % Neutral % Agree % Strongly Agree Mean Stdv. Mean
The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course. 13 0 0 0 8 92 3.92 0.277 2.89
The instructor was responsive to student concerns. 13 0 0 0 8 92 3.92 0.277 3.06
The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content. 13 0 0 0 23 77 3.77 0.439 2.78
* Average rating for all similarly leveled course sections (e.g., all 200-level course sections) in this college.
 



Grade distribution is current as of August 30, 2010 and includes students receiving a W for the course.
Course Evaluation Reports


   
 		  
  Return to Main Menu

Comments, questions, and suggestions may be directed to OIT Help Desk